Validation of the oral health impact profile (OHIP-20sp) for Spanish edentulous patients

  1. Javier Montero Martín 1
  2. Carla Macedo de Paula 2
  3. Antonio López-Valverde Centeno 3
  4. Manuel Bravo Pérez 4
  1. 1 Tenured lecturer of Prosthodontics. Department of Surgery. Faculty of Medicine. University of Salamanca. Spain
  2. 2 Postgraduate Student. Department of Surgery. Faculty of Medicine. University of Salamanca. Spain
  3. 3 Associate professor of Periodontology. Department of Surgery. Faculty of Medicine. University of Salamanca. Spain
  4. 4 Professor of Community and Preventive Dentistry. Department of Preventive Dentistry. School of Dentistry. University of Granada. Spain
Show affiliations +
Journal:
Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa

ISSN: 1698-6946

Year of publication: 2012

Volume: 17

Issue: 3

Pages: 9

Type: Article

DOI: 10.4317/MEDORAL.17498 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal. Ed. inglesa

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Objectives: The purposes of this study are to validate the indicator of Oral Health Impact Profile for edentulous patients (OHIP-20sp) in the Spanish population and to analyze the factorial construct of the prosthetic well-being. Study Design: A total of twenty-one (n=21) edentulous patients wearing mandibular implant-over dentures on Locator® (LO) and twenty (n=20) with complete dentures (CD) were retrospectively evaluated in this study. All participants were recruited consecutively and were treated in the previous academic year 2009-2010 by professors of the University of Salamanca. Reliability analyses and validity tests were performed in order to evaluate the psychometric properties of OHIP-20sp employing two different total score methods (additional and simple count). A retrospective evaluation of the impact of the prosthetic treatment was captured with an evaluative instrument derived from OHIP-20, and named POST-OHIP-13. Results: The reliability coefficient (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.91) has shown a high internal consistency. Item-total correlations coefficients ranged from 0.46 and 0.81. Five factors, named as disability, functional comfort, psychosocial impact, pain-discomfort and functional limitations were identified as principal components of the construct, explaining almost 85% of the variance. The 48% of the sample felt at least one impact in an occasional or more frequently manner (generally food packing). The global transition judgment of the prosthetic treatment using the POST-OHIP-13 was significantly higher in group LO than in the CD group. Conclusions: OHIP-20 seems to be a reliable and valid indicator to measure oral impact and satisfaction in the Spanish edentulous population. The underlying construct is comprised by 5 factors named as disability, functional comfort, psychosocial impact, pain-discomfort and functional limitations.

Bibliographic References

  • Bravo, M, Cortés, J, Casals, E, Llena, C, Almerich-Silla, JM, Cuenca, E. (2009). Basic oral health goals for Spain 2015/2020. Int Dent J. 59. 78-82
  • Bourgeois, D, Nihtila, A, Mersel, A. (1998). Prevalence of caries and edentulousness among 65-74-year-olds in Europe. Bull World Health Organ. 76. 413
  • Locker, D. (1988). Measuring oral health: A conceptual framework. Community Dental Health. 5. 3-18
  • Atchison, KA, Dolan, T. (1990). Development of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index. J Dent Educ. 54. 680
  • Slade, GD, Spencer, JA. (1994). Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Health. 11. 3-11
  • Leão, A, Sheiham, A. (1996). The development of a socio-dental measure of dental impacts on daily living. Community Dent Health. 13. 22
  • Adulyanon, S, Vourapukjaru, J, Sheiham, A. (1996). Oral impacts affecting daily performance in a low dental disease Thai population. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 24. 385
  • Allen, PF, McMillan, AS, Locker, D. (2001). An assessment of sensitivity to change of the Oral Health Impact Profile in a clinical trial. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 29. 175
  • Melas, F, Marcenes, W, Wright, PS. (2001). Oral health impact on daily performance in implant-stabilized overdentures and patients with conventional complete dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 16. 700
  • Montero-Martín, J, Bravo-Pérez, M, Albaladejo-Martínez, A, Hernández-Martín, LA, Rosel-Gallardo, EM. (2009). Validation the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14sp) for adults in Spain. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 14. 44-50
  • Allen, PF, Locker, D. (2002). A modified short version of the Oral Health Impact Profile for assessing health-related quality of life in edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont. 15. 446
  • Montero, J, López, JF, Galindo, MP, Vicente, P, Bravo, M. (2009). Impact of prosthodontic status on oral wellbeing: a cross-sectional cohort study. J Oral Rehabil. 36. 592-600
  • Awad, MA, Lund, JP, Shapiro, SH, Locker, D, Klemetti, E, Chehade, A. (2003). Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population. Int J Prosthodont. 16. 390
  • Assunção, WG, Zardo, GG, Delben, JA, Barão, VA. (2007). Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among elderly edentulous patients: satisfaction and quality of life. Gerodontol. 24. 235
  • Souza, RF, Patrocínio, L, Pero, AC, Marra, J, Compagnoni, MA. (2007). Reliability and validation of a Brazilian version of the Oral Health Impact Profile for assessing edentulous subjects. J Oral Rehabil. 34. 821
  • Anastassiadou, V, Robin Heath, M. (2006). The effect of denture quality attributes on satisfaction and eating difficulties. Gerodontol. 23. 23-32
  • Sheiham, A, Steele, JG, Marcenes, W, Tsakos, G, Finch, S, Walls, AW. (2001). Prevalence of impacts of dental and oral disorders and their effects on eating among older people; a national survey in Great Britain. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 29. 195-203
  • Robinson, PG, Gibson, B, Khan, FA, Birnbaum, W. (2003). Validity of two oral health-related quality of life measures. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 31. 90
  • Allen, PF, McMillan, AS, Walshaw, D, Locker, D. (1999). A comparison of the validity of generic- and disease-specific measures in the assessment of oral health-related quality of life. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 27. 344
  • John, MT, Reissmann, DR, Szentpétery, A, Steele, J. (2009). An approach to define clinical significance in prosthodontics. J Prosthodont. 18. 455
  • John, MT, Hujoel, P, Miglioretti, DL, LeResche, L, Koepsell, TD, Micheelis, W. (2004). Dimensions of oral-health-related quality of life. J Dent Res. 83. 956
  • Gift, HC, Atchison, KA. (1995). Oral health, health, and health-related quality of life. Med Care. 33. 57-77
  • Streiner, DL. (1994). Figuring out factors: the use and misuse of factor analysis. Can J Psychiatry. 39. 135-140
  • Guyatt, GH, Kirshner, B, Jaeschke, R. (1992). Measuring health status: what are the necessary measurement properties? J Clin Epidemiol. 12. 1341
  • Locker, D, Mscn, EW, Jokovic, A. (2005). What do older adults’ global self-ratings of oral health measure? J Public Health Dent. 65. 146-152
  • Strauss, RP, Hunt, RJ. (1993). Understanding the value of teeth to older adults: influences on the quality of life. J Am Dent Assoc. 124. 105
  • Baker, SR, Pearson, NK, Robinson, PG. (2008). Testing the applicability of a conceptual model of oral health in housebound edentulous older people. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 36. 237
Data source: Dialnet