Las Rondas de Seguridad con Directivos: una herramienta que mejora la atención del paciente crítico

  1. M, Belén Suárez-Mier
  2. M, Carmen Martínez-Ortega
  3. Estefanía, Vegas-Pardavila
  4. María, Fernández- Prada
  5. Luis Angel, Cofiño-Castañeda
  6. Yolanda, Díaz-Alonso
  7. M, Sol Salamanca-Corteguera
Revista:
Actualidad médica

ISSN: 0365-7965

Ano de publicación: 2014

Tomo: 99

Número: 791

Páxinas: 18-21

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.15568/AM.2014.791.OR04 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Actualidad médica

Resumo

Objectives: 1) To describe the process of implementation of walkrounds with hospital managers in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) at a tertiary hospital ; 2) To examine whether there were differences between the WR in the Adult Intensive Care Unit (AICU) and the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU ); 3) To know the opinion of the participants about the tool. Methodology: It is an analytic and longitudinal study done between 2009 and 2011. It was used a sheet with 6 items: 1) Presence of wristband ; 2) Dressings roads in good condition; 3) Headboard at 30º; 4) Special mattress adapted to patients with pressure ulcers ; 5 ) Sheet for medical treatments without any doubts for nurses and 6) Daily goal sheet fulfilled. It was used Statistical U Mann – Whitney for nonparametric samples. Results: A total of 167 patients were seen in 7. walkrounds At the beginning, items “mattress for patients with pressure ulcers” and “daily goal sheet fulfilled” had less than 60% of compliance in AICU. For the PICU, we found 0 % of compliance in the presence of wristband. There were statistically significant differences between the AICU and the PICU for those items. Conclusion: Walkrounds with hospital managers applied to ICUs at our hospital improved important aspects of patient safety. The involvement of hospital managers was the most important thing for the rest of health care workers and it ensured the successful implementation of the tool

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aranaz JM, Aibar C, Vitaller J. Ruiz-López P, Limón-Ramírez, R, Terol-García E, and the ENEAS Work Group. Incidence of adverse events related to health care in Spain: results of the Spanish National Study of Adverse Events. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008;62:1022-9.
  • Estudio Nacional sobre los efectos adversos ligados a la hospitalización. ENEAS 2005. (Informe Febrero 2006). Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo; 2006.
  • Frankel A, Graydon-Baker E, Neppl C, Simmonds T, Gustafson M, Gandhi TK. Patient Safety Leadership WalkRounds. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2003;29:16-26.
  • McCambridge J, Witton J, Elbourne DR. Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: New concepts are needed to study research participaton effects. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:267-77.
  • Menéndez MD, Martínez AB, Fernández M, Ortega N, Díaz JM, Vázquez, F. Walkrounds y Briefings en la mejora de la seguridad de los pacientes. Calidad Asistencial. 2010;25:153-60.
  • O’Connor P. Looking for Harm in Healthcare: Can Patient Safety Leadership Walk Rounds help to detect and prevent harm in NHS hospitals? A Case Study of NHS Tayside. [tesis doctoral]. Scotland: University of St Andrews; 2012.
  • Reducción de bacteriemias relacionadas con catéteres en los servicios de medicina intensiva mediante una intervención multifactorial. Informe del estudio. Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo; 2009.
  • The Research Priority Setting Working Group of the WHO World Alliance for Patient Safety. Summary of the Evidence on Patient Safety: Implications for Research. Ginebra: Organización Mundial de la Salud, 2008.
  • The Research Priority Setting Working Group of the WHO World Alliance for Patient Safety. Summary of the Evidence on Patient Safety: Implications for Research. Ginebra: Organización Mundial de la Salud, 2008.
  • Thomas EJ, Sexton JB, NEilands TB, Frankel A, Helmreich RL. The effect of executive walk rounds on nurse safety climate attitudes: A randomized trial of clinical units. BMC Health Services Research. 2005;5:28.