Queratoplastia endotelial automatizada con pelado de membrana de Descemet (DSAEK). Revisión sistemática sobre efectividad y seguridad

  1. L. Paz-Valiñas 1
  2. R. de la Fuente-Cid 1
  3. M.V. de Rojas-Silva 2
  4. I. López-Rodríguez 2
  5. M. López-García 1
  1. 1 Axencia de Evaluación de Tecnoloxías Sanitarias de Galicia (avalia-t), Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, España (Consellería de Sanidadem, Dirección Xeral de Innovación e Xestión da Saúde Pública
  2. 2 Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, La Coruña, España Servizo de Oftalmoloxía
Journal:
Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologia

ISSN: 0365-6691

Year of publication: 2015

Volume: 90

Issue: 4

Pages: 164-179

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1016/J.OFTAL.2014.09.002 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

More publications in: Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologia

Abstract

Objective To conduct a systematic review of the efficacy/effectiveness, safety and cost of Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) technique in patients with corneal endothelial failure. Methods Comprehensive literature search conducted in the main biomedical databases from January-May 2012. Results Following a critical perusal of the total of 485 abstracts retrieved, 16 case series and one economic evaluation study were included. Corrected distance visual acuity and uncorrected distance visual acuity improved after treatment with DSAEK, attaining values of 0.6 to 0.8 and 0.5 respectively. The degree of post-DSAEK astigmatism was not significant with respect to baseline values. The main complications were graft dislocation-detachment (1.5-23%), primary failure (0-12%) and endothelial rejection (0.8-8.5%). Conclusions In Fuchs’ dystrophy and bullous keratopathy, data on the effectiveness of DSAEK indicate post-intervention improvement in uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity. Astigmatism arising after DSAEK was not significant. The most significant post-DSAEK complications are linked to the viability of the graft, with the most frequent complications being dislocation-detachment and, to a lesser extent, endothelial rejection. The studies that assess DSAEK are case series, and for the most part retrospective. The quality of this type of studies is both low and limited.