Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) in Cancer PatientsPsychometric Properties and Measurement Invariance

  1. Caterina Calderón 1
  2. Pere Joan Ferrando 2
  3. Urbano Lorenzo-Seva 2
  4. David Gómez-Sánchez 3
  5. Ana Fernández-Montes 4
  6. Maria Palacín-Lois 1
  7. Mónica Antoñanzas-Basa 5
  8. Jacobo Rogado 6
  9. Aránzazu Manzano-Fernández 5
  10. Estrella Ferreira 1
  11. Elena Asensio-Martínez 7
  12. Paula Jiménez-Fonseca 3
  1. 1 Universitat de Barcelona
    info

    Universitat de Barcelona

    Barcelona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/021018s57

  2. 2 Rovira and Virgili University
  3. 3 Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, ISPA, Oviedo,
  4. 4 Complejo Hospitalario de Orense
  5. 5 Hospital Clínico San Carlos de Madrid
    info

    Hospital Clínico San Carlos de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04d0ybj29

  6. 6 Hospital Infanta Leonor
    info

    Hospital Infanta Leonor

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05nfzf209

  7. 7 Hospital General Universitario de Elche
    info

    Hospital General Universitario de Elche

    Elche, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01jmsem62

Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915,  1886-144X

Año de publicación: 2021

Volumen: 33

Número: 1

Páginas: 131-138

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Psicothema

Resumen

Antecedentes: el objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar las propiedades psicométricas, la validez convergente y la invariancia factorial de la Escala Multidimensional de Apoyo Social Percibido (MSPSS) en pacientes con cáncer. Método: el análisis factorial confirmatorio (CFA) se realizó para explorar la dimensionalidad de la escala y la invariancia de medición por sexo y edad en un estudio prospectivo, transversal y multicéntrico. Los pacientes completaron el MSPSS y la Escala de Satisfacción con la Vida (SWLS). Resultados: un total de 925 pacientes consecutivos fueron reclutados en 13 hospitales entre julio de 2015 y diciembre de 2018. El CFA indicó que el modelo original de tres factores fue replicado en pacientes con cáncer. Los resultados del CFA multigrupo revelaron invariancia fuerte según el sexo y la edad. La versión en español del MSPSS tenía una alta fiabilidad estimada, con valores superiores a 0,90. La suma simple de los ítems de cada escala fue un buen indicador del apoyo social percibido de los pacientes oncológicos. Las tres subescalas MSPSS se correlacionaron significativamente con el SWLS. Conclusión: la versión en español del MSPSS demostró ser un instrumento válido y confiable para evaluar el apoyo social percibido en pacientes con cáncer.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

This work was supported by the FSEOM-Onvida 2015 grant for Projects on Long Survivors and Quality of Life.

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Akhtar, A., Rahman, A., Husain, M., Chaudhry, I. B., Duddu, V., & Husain, N. (2010). Multidimensional scale of perceived social support: Psychometric properties in a South Asian population. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 36(4), 845-851. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01204.x
  • Aloba, O., Opakunle, T., & Ogunrinu, O. (2019). Psychometric characteristics and measurement invariance across genders of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) among Nigerian adolescents. Health Psychology Report, 7(1), 69-80. https://doi.org/10.5114/hpr.2019.82629
  • Aroian, K., Templin, T. N., & Ramaswamy, V. (2010). Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support for Arab immigrant women. Health Care for Women International, 31(2), 153-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399330903052145
  • Beauducel, A. (2011). Indeterminacy of Factor Score Estimates in Slightly Misspecified Confirmatory Factor Models. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 10(2), 583-598. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1320120900
  • Browne, M. W. (1974). Generalized least squares estimators in the analysis of covariance structures. South African Statistical Journal, 8(1), 1-24.
  • Bugajski, A., Frazier, S. K., Moser, D. K., Lennie, T. A., & Chung, M. (2019). Psychometric testing of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support in patients with comorbid COPD and heart failure. Heart & Lung, 48(3), 193-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2018.09.014
  • Calderón, C., Navarro-González, D., Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando-Piera, P. J. (2019). Multidimensional or essentially unidimensional? A multifaceted factor-analytic approach for assessing the dimensionality of tests and items. Psicothema.Com, 31, 450-457. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2019.153
  • Costa-Requena, G., Ballester Arnal, R., & Gil, F. (2015). The influence of demographic and clinical variables on perceived social support in cancer patients. Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica, 20(1), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.5944/rppc.vol.1.num.1.2015.14404
  • Dambi, J. M., Corten, L., Chiwaridzo, M., Jack, H., Mlambo, T., & Jelsma, J. (2018). A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the cross-cultural translations and adaptations of the Multidimensional Perceived Social Support Scale (MSPSS). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 16(1), 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-0912-0
  • Dambi, J. M., Tapera, L., Chiwaridzo, M., Tadyanemhandu, C., & Nhunzvi, C. (2017). Psychometric evaluation of the Shona version of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support Scale (MSPSSShona) in adult informal caregivers of patients with cancer in Harare, Zimbabwe. Malawi Medical Journal, 29(2), 89-96. https://doi.org/10.4314/mmj.v29i2.3
  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
  • Dong, X., & Liu, A. (2017). Variations between sources of social support and cancer screen behaviors in US Chinese older adults. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 72(suppl_1), S26-S31.
  • Ferrando, P. J. (1996). Calibration of Invariant Item Parameters in a Continuous Item Response Model Using the Extended Lisrel Measurement Submodel. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31(4), 419-439. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3104_2
  • Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2013). Unrestricted item factor analysis and some relations with item response theory. http://psico.fcep.urv.es/utilitats/factor/
  • Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2017). Assessing the Quality and Appropriateness of Factor Solutions and Factor Score Estimates in Exploratory Item Factor Analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 001316441771930. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164417719308
  • Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2018). Assessing the quality and appropriateness of factor solutions and factor score estimates in exploratory item factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78(5), 762-780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164417719308
  • Geue, K., Götze, H., Friedrich, M., Leuteritz, K., Mehnert-Theuerkauf, A., Sender, A., Stöbel-Richter, Y., & Köhler, N. (2019). Perceived social support and associations with health-related quality of life in young versus older adult patients with haematological malignancies. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 17(1), 145. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1202-1
  • Guan, N. C., Seng, L. H., Hway Ann, A. Y., & Hui, K. O. (2015). Factorial validity and reliability of the Malaysian simplified Chinese version of multidimensional scale of perceived social support (MSPSS-SCV) among a group of university students. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 27(2), 225-231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539513477684
  • Hetherington, E., Doktorchik, C., Premji, S. S., McDonald, S. W., Tough, S. C., & Sauve, R. S. (2015). Preterm birth and social support during pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 29(6), 523-535. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.12225
  • Hong, S. J., Shin, N. M., & Jung, S. (2020). A predictive model of fear of cancer recurrence for patients undergoing chemotherapy. Supportive Care in Cancer, 1, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05245-7
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Kline, R. (2011). Methodology in the social sciences. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
  • Laksmita, O. D., Chung, M.-H., Liao, Y.-M., & Chang, P.-C. (2020). Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support in Indonesian adolescent disaster survivors: A psychometric evaluation. PLoS One, 15(3), e0229958. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229958
  • Little, T. D. (1997). Mean and Covariance Structures (MACS) Analyses of Cross-Cultural Data: Practical and Theoretical Issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(1), 53-76. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3201_3
  • Lorenzo-Seva, U., Calderón, C., Ferrando, P. J., del Mar Muñoz, M., Beato, C., Ghanem, I., Castelo, B., Carmona-Bayonas, A., Hernández, R., & Jiménez-Fonseca, P. (2019). Psychometric properties and factorial analysis of invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) in cancer patients. Quality of Life Research, 28(5), 1255-1264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02106-y
  • Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2020). Unrestricted factor analysis of multidimensional test items based on an objectively refined target matrix. Behavior Research Methods, 52(1), 116-130. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01209-1
  • Lorenzo-Seva, U., & ten Berge, J. M. F. (2006). Tucker’s congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology, 2(2), 57-64. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.2.2.57
  • Millsap, R. E., & Meredith, W. (2007). Factorial invariance: Historical perspectives and new problems. In R. Cudeck & R.C. MacCallum (Eds.), Factor analysis at 100: Historical developments and future directions (pp. 131-152). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2004). Mplus user’s guide: Statistical analysis with latent variables: User’s guide. Muthén & Muthén.
  • Nearchou, F., Davies, A., & Hennessy, E. (2019). Psychometric evaluation of the Multi-Dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support in young adults with chronic health conditions. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2019.54
  • Oh, G. H., Yeom, C.-W., Shim, E.-J., Jung, D., Lee, K.-M., Son, K.-L., Kim, W.-H., Moon, J. Y., Jung, S., & Kim, T.-Y. (2020). The effect of perceived social support on chemotherapy-related symptoms in patients with breast cancer: A prospective observational study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 130, 109911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.109911
  • Pruneti, C. A., Cosentino, C., Merisio, C., & Berretta, R. (2020). Adapting to Cancer with Body, Mind, and Heart: Psychological, Psychophysiological Assessment and Management in Sample of Ovarian Cancer Survivors. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Oncology, 9(1), 1-6.
  • Rutkowski, N. A., Lebel, S., Richardson, K., Mutsaers, B., Chasen, M., & Feldstain, A. (2018). A little help from my friends: Social support in palliative rehabilitation. Current Oncology, 25(6), 358-365. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.25.4050
  • Stewart, R. C., Umar, E., Tomenson, B., & Creed, F. (2014). Validation of the multi-dimensional scale of perceived social support (MSPSS) and the relationship between social support, intimate partner violence and antenatal depression in Malawi. BMC Psychiatry, 14(1), 180. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-14-180
  • Taheri, A., Ahadi, H., Kashani, F. L., & Kermani, R. A. (2014). ScienceDirect Mental Hardiness and Social Support in Life Satisfaction of Breast Cancer Patients. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 159, 406- 409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.397
  • Teh, W. L., Shahwan, S., Abdin, E., Zhang, Y., Sambasivam, R., Devi, F., Verma, S., Chong, S. A., & Subramaniam, M. (2019). Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Measurement Invariance of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support in Young Psychiatric and Non-Psychiatric Asians. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 48(10), 314.
  • Traver, D. F., Aliste, Á. M. F., & Muñiz, J. (2000). Detección del funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems no uniforme: comparación de los métodos Mantel-Haenszel y regresión logística. Psicothema, 12(Su2), 220-225.
  • Wang, Y., Wan, Q., Huang, Z., Huang, L., & Kong, F. (2017). Psychometric Properties of multi-dimensional scale of perceived social support in Chinese parents of children with cerebral palsy. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02020
  • Wongpakaran, T., Wongpakaran, N., & Ruktrakul, R. (2011). Reliability and validity of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support (MSPSS): Thai version. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health: CP & EMH, 7, 161. https://doi.org/10.2174/1745017901107010161
  • Zimet, G. D., Powell, S. S., Farley, G. K., Werkman, S., & Berkoff, K. A. (1990). Psychometric characteristics of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55(3-4), 610-617. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.1990.9674095
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet